M1L5: India - Uzbekistan relations


Importance of Uzbekistan

Uzbekistan is one of the most important countries in Central Asia. It lies mainly between two major rivers, the Syr Darya (ancient Jaxartes River) to the northeast and the Amu Darya (ancient Oxus River) to the southwest, though they only partly form its boundaries. Between the two is the heartland of the region, the Ferghana valley. Agriculture is based largely in the fertile Fergana Valley region makes up a quarter of the Uzbek gross domestic product, with cotton and wheat as primary exports. All of this has led Uzbekistan to be more self-sufficient than many of its neighbors, which rely on foreign help for energy and food. For example, Uzbekistan produces 85% of the wheat and 90% of the rice and barley they consume. This historically has made the Uzbek people one of the natural leaders in the region as it has all the essential resources, required to drive its economic growth.

Uzbekistan also has the largest population among the five Central Asian states — 30 million people and growing rapidly. The Uzbek corridor through Bukhara, Tashkent and Samarkand was the Silk Road for trade from Asia to the Middle East, South Asia and Europe starting in the first millennium B.C.



Uzbekistan is the only Central Asian state to border all the other Central Asian states — Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan — and Afghanistan to its south. Therefore, what happens in Uzbekistan can affect the wider region.





History of relations between India and Uzbekistan

Relations between India and Uzbekistan can be traced to a time, that is as old as the Timurid Empire, comprising modern-day Uzbekistan, Iran, the southern Caucasus, Mesopotamia, Afghanistan, much of Central Asia, as well as parts of contemporary India, Pakistan, Syria and Turkey.

The empire was founded by Timur (also known as Tamerlane), a warlord of Turco-Mongol lineage, who established the empire between 1370 and his death in 1405. In the 16th century, Babur, a Timurid prince from Ferghana (modern Uzbekistan), invaded Kabulistan (modern Afghanistan) and established a small kingdom there, and from there 20 years later he invaded India to establish the Mughal Empire. Mughal, the name of the dynasty, is a variant of Mongol and was used in India to distinguish immigrants or the recently immigrated from local Muslims. Because Babur’s father, Umar Sheikh Mirza, was directly descended from Timur (1336–1405), the great Central Asia empire builder, it is more accurate to call the dynasty Timurid, the name by which it was known to Indians of the period.

Muhammad Zahir al-Din Babur always wanted to go to Samarkand. However, he could never expand Westwards due to the strong armies of Safavid empire in Persia.

Source: Time in Early Modern Islam
Calendar, Ceremony, and Chronology in the Safavid, Mughal and Ottoman Empires, February 2013, pp 21-47, Cambridge University Press


Turkey, Russia, and Iran all have claims in Eurasia by virtue of their history. Turkey sees Eurasia as a part of Ottoman empire, Iran sees as a part of Seljuk/Safavid/Fatimid empire whereas Russia sees it as a part of its Soviet empire. Everyone wants to dominate either politically, economically or militarily. (Sounds familiar right? This is analogous to Akhand Bharat theory of Rastriya Swayam Sewak Sangh)

A new entrant among all of them is Saudi Arabia that is more interested in spreading Wahhabi/Salafi school of thought.

Abū Rayḥān Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad Al-Bīrūnī, known as Biruni or Al-Biruni in English language, was an Iranian scholar and polymath. He was from Khwarazm – a region which encompasses modern-day western Uzbekistan, and northern Turkmenistan.

His book on Indian culture is by far the most important of his encyclopaedic works. Its expressive title, Taḥqīq mā li-l-hind min maqūlah maqbūlah fī al-ʿaql aw mardhūlah (“Verifying All That the Indians Recount, the Reasonable and the Unreasonable”), says it all; it includes all the lore that al-Bīrūnī could gather about India and its science, religion, literature, and customs.


From the Silk Road to the Soviet Union

The people of Uzbek are inherently fractured along geographic, ethnic and intra-ethnic lines. These divisions are commonly referred to in the country as clans. Most Uzbeks see themselves as part of a clan before considering themselves part of a single nation.

With clan struggles continuing to define the power players and sectors in Uzbekistan, powers outside of the country will try to take advantage of the divisions, as they have in the past. If outsiders can exploit Uzbekistan's internal divisions effectively, they can increase their influence in this important Central Asian state.

Outside powers tend to bypass the central authority (union government) by directly engaging with various communities that owe loyalty to them. Remember how the British ruled India?

Meanwhile, after the Muslim Turks conquered Constantinople, new ocean trade routes were getting discovered to establish the route from Europe to India and China in the 17th and the 18th Century, to circumvent the Silk Route. (Remember Vasco Da Gama??)  


As European-dominated ocean transport expanded, trading centers were destroyed. One of them was Samarkand. With the loss of revenue that Uzbekistan could earn upon the Silk route, it got weakened. Couple this with Russia interference and conquest of Uzbekistan by engaging with clans loyal to itself., they could expand their empire in the 19th and 20th century. Later, the Soviet government established the Uzbek Soviet Socialist Republic and merged the Uzbek republic into the former Soviet Union (former U.S.S.R.) in 1924. Uzbekistan declared its independence from the Soviet Union on August 31, 1991. The capital is Tashkent (Toshkent).


India and Pakistan signed armistice in Tashkent on 10 January 1966 that resolved the Indo-Pakistani War of 1965.


Mineral resources of Uzbekistan

Uzbekistan holds the world's 18th largest natural gas reserves and is a major exporter of electricity produced from both natural gas and hydropower. The country also holds large mineral deposits, ranking the 10th largest in gold, 11th in uranium and 10th in copper.

Uzbekistan has both coal, oil and gas. However, their volume is only enough to make Uzbekistan self-sufficient. There is no surplus left to be exported. In future, if any surplus amount of oil and gas is discovered in Uzbekistan, we can connect it with the proposed TAPI gas pipeline project.

Other than fossil duels, Uzbekistan is bestowed with huge amount of uranium that can be exported to other energy hungry nations – struggling to make a transition towards clean energy. Nuclear energy is one among the sources for clean energy, free from carbon emission. With Integrated policy in existence since the year 2005, the government of India in the 2014, signed an agreement with Uzbekistan to supply up to 2,000 metric tons of Uranium ore concentrate to India over the next four years (2014-2018). With Uzbekistan, we have also decided to create a strategic nuclear fuel reserve for next ten years. This was agreed to in the year 2017.

Economic opportunities

In terms of economy, Uzbekistan is a special case since it is going for import substitution strategy. Uzbekistan has the best quality of human capital with 97% literacy as education was largely government funded. As of now, Uzbekistan hosts a very young demographic dividend, that is becoming restless due to scarcity of decent jobs and respectable sources of employment. Estimates by international financial institutions suggest that Uzbekistan needs to grow at double digit growth rates to create that many jobs to absorb new labor entrants. The Uzbek government is therefore trying to industrialize aggressively. It has persuaded South Korean and Chinese car manufacturers to produce both electric power and conventionally powered vehicles locally. This policy to attract more investments has also driven Uzbekistan to improve its economic relations with India as India serves as both a source of FDI and a large market.

Uzbekistan is trying to extend trans-Afghan connectivity to Iran’ port of Chabahar and Pakistan’ port of Gwadar, to improve its access to the sea and exports to the Gulf. To do the same, it is trying to extend railroad connectivity to Herat and Kabul. Herat is connected to rail-road network of Iran (and thereby Chabahar port) while Kabul is connected to rail-road network of Pakistan (and thereby Gwadar). Through Kabul, Uzbekistan will also be able to participate in Afghanistan India air corridor, thereby allowing its exports to travel along the routes to India and vice versa. 



This key rail link extension project connecting Uzbekistan and Afghanistan could see collaboration between Beijing and New Delhi. This can serve as a demonstration of "China-India Plus" model which was recently proposed by Beijing enabling the two Asian giants to cooperate in development and connectivity projects in other countries.

In the year 2011, US led NATO coalition in Afghanistan and Asian Development Bank (ADB) completed the construction of Termez Hairatan border crossing that connects Uzbekistan to Mazar e Sharif. Currently, this road is the main transit road to cargo from Uzbekistan to Afghanistan.

(Hairatan is a town on the Uzbek-Afghan border and Mazar-e-Sharif is a major city in northern Afghanistan)

Another interesting reason, that is driving Uzbekistan to improve relations with India is that it doesn’t want to be overly dependent on China for investments that coming as a part of Belt and Road initiative. Like many other countries in Central Asia, Uzbekistan has also adopted Multi-vector policy to diversify its relations with other countries and does not want to become overwhelmingly dependent only on one country.

The specialization of the Uzbek economy was determined by the planners based on the overall interest and needs of the Soviet Union, and it was to become an integral part of the Soviet socialist economy. Their strategy of Soviet economic development regarding Uzbekistan was intensive development of cotton production and of the consumer-oriented light industrial activities (for e.g. paper and paper products, ceramics, textile, leather and leather goods).

Certain industries were also developed. In a sense this strategy of development for Central Asia was at variance with the overall Soviet strategy of development with emphasis on heavy industry. In the initial period, the source of accumulation of capital was in the form of transfer of resources from the Centre, i.e. Moscow, towards the Central Asian Republics (CARs). More than 60 percent of the resources required for economic development was transferred from the central budget to Uzbekistan and other republics. As a result, in the pre-war period very few industries were set up, producing and so on.

Large resources were spent for building of irrigation canals, production of chemicals and fertilizers for intensive cultivation of cotton. One of the major casualties due to this planning without considering the impact on environment was the complete drying up of Aral Sea. 




However, with the exploration of non-ferrous and precious minerals in Uzbekistan, the attention shifted towards the development of large industrial plants. Subsequently, new electric stations were constructed at Navoi and Tashkent, hydroelectric stations at Charvak and Bozsuki, Fergana oil processing plant, superphosphate plant at Samarkand, heavy engineering units at Tashkent, metallurgical combine at Almalik, Navoi chemical combine, and so on.

The rapid and forcible industrialization of the Soviet era (with a strong focus on military needs) was associated with huge structural distortions and microeconomic ineffectiveness. Imbalance in development, resulting from overemphasis on cotton cultivation for instance, led to the shift in cultivation from food grains vital for food security to an intensive cultivation of cotton. This made the republic dependent for food grains on other republics. Only' in the 80s was this mistake realized. The lack of processing facilities for agricultural produce turned the state mainly into a supplier of raw materials like cotton and other minerals to the Soviet Union. Inadequate training and education in technical fields forced the republic to depend on external cadres which caused social tensions in the recent years.

After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the industries and supply chains connecting the local industries with Moscow got cut-off. Many industrial enterprises in Central Asia lost their previous markets and were unable to compete under the new market conditions. Partial de-industrialization in the post-Soviet period was thus no surprise leading to wide scale poverty and despair among these countries. Uzbekistan suffered less economic shock from the dissolution of the Soviet Union than did most other former Soviet republics because it produces large amounts of cotton and gold, commodities of value on world markets, and because the government stressed development of import-replacement industries in the post-Soviet era.

As a result, on the eve of the disintegration of the Soviet Union, Uzbek economy had several branches of industry which were fairly well developed. They were electricity generation, steel processing, non-ferrous metallurgy, and precious mineral industries particularly gold and silver, etc. There was an aviation industry in the republic. However, many of these industries were developed only during 60s and 70s and later. As part of the reforms, it is planned to develop a strategy for the formation of the aerospace industry for 2018-2035.

After a painful transition period, growth picked up in 2000s, largely driven by growing exports of commodities such as oil and natural gas (Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan), aluminum (Tajikistan), gold (Kyrgyzstan), cotton (Tajikistan and Uzbekistan) and other metals (Kazakhstan), to increase revenue via exports and eliminate the Soviet era need to import oil. However, after experiencing more than a decade of growth based on commodity exports like hydrocarbons and metals, the Central Asian countries are faced with increasing challenges resulting from falling commodity prices, declining trade and lower migrant remittances from Russia and Kazakhstan.

In the same period between 1990s till 2014, these countries also provided a renewed thrust on the expansion of grain cultivation to achieve food security. This helped Uzbekistan and other CARs to reduce food import bills. Although cotton remains the most valuable agricultural product for Uzbekistan, its output has declined since the mid-1990s.

The major obstacles to political reform and structural diversification to move away from commodity-based growth strategies to market-oriented economic growth model in the five Central Asian economies are internal and external geopolitical factors. This is coupled with deeply embedded institutional weaknesses within each country and is particularly true in areas where economic management interacts with authoritarian political systems and imperfect legal institutions.
Under the leadership of Shavkat Mirziyoyev, who took the helm in 2016 following the death of former president Islam Karimov, Uzbekistan is now among the world’s fastest-growing economies.
The government is making three fundamental shifts to the economy:
1.    from a command-and-control to a market-based economy;
2.    from a rent-seeking public sector-dominated to a private sector-driven economy;
3.    and from being inward-looking and isolationist to outward looking and open.

Following such reforms, government data shows that the number of tourist arrivals has more than doubled in 2018 and the foreign direct investments have increased four-fold in the first half of 2019 compared to a year ago. Significant challenges still remain. Even today, Uzbekistan one of the least energy-efficient countries in the world.

“Uzbekistan Is the Hidden Gem in China's New Silk Road.”
Rainer Michael Preiss
September 9, 2019, Forbes.com
Uzbekistan and India-EaEU PTA

Uzbekistan borders all the countries. This gives a lot of potential for trade, transport and financial hub. However, since Uzbekistan is not a member of Eurasian Economic Union (EaEu), with which India intends to sign a Free Trade agreement (FTA) or a Preferential trade agreement (PTA). This serves as a major irritant for India.

With the retreat of USA from Afghanistan, Russia wants to re-fill that geopolitical vacuum as a reliable security provider in Eurasia. Soviet aggression in Ukraine in 2013 and Georgia in 2008, shows that Vladmir Putin has big plans to restore former Soviet Union. Uzbekistan believes that the Eurasian Economic Union bloc (EaEU) is a part of this project to ‘re-Sovietize’ the region. Uzbekistan is also suspicious of Russian military assistance and economic assistance to Kyrgystan and Tajikistan, with whom Uzbekistan shares riparian issues. These two countries are trying to build for Roghun and Kamrabata dam in the upstream, that may reduce the flow of water in the downstream where Uzbekistan is located. Tajikistan borders Uzbekistan to the North.

Uzbekistan is a relatively strong country in the region, by virtue of its economic potential and lesser amount of dependence on Russia for remittances to drive its GDP. It has therefore developed a propensity to remain relatively independent from any other power. Along these lines. it has always tried to resist control by the Russian Empire and the former Soviet Union.

More recently, this tendency has flared up amid Russia's attempts to increase its influence in Central Asia again. Uzbekistan has rebuffed Russia's resurgence by pulling out of alliance structures (such as the Collective Security Treaty Organization) and increased hostilities with its more Russia-friendly neighbors, like Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan.


Uzbekistan and Tajikistan relations

Tajikistan borders by Afghanistan to the South. It is mostly hilly and suffers from lack of infrastructure connectivity with the other Eurasian countries. The bulk of its border security is provided by the Russians that want to restrict the movement of drugs moving up north and affecting the citizens of the Russian federation. With extraordinary potential to produce hydropower, Tajikistan has made big plans to tap the same and export electricity to other countries under the CASA-1000 project and solve the problem of electricity shortage in its own country.
On account of its geography, Uzbekistan shares the downstream of Amu Darya compared to Tajikistan which is in the upstream. Hence, when Tajikistan decided to construct the Roghun dam, Uzbekistan protested by cutting off all the electricity lines that connected Tajikistan to the electricity grids of Turkmenistan via Uzbekistan. It also dismantled the railway tracks that connected Uzbekistan with Tajikistan, blocked all its exports passing along its borders and stopped supplying hydrocarbons.

Tajikistan, therefore, wants to bypass Uzbekistan via Northern Afghanistan, to connect itself with Turkmenistan. Together these countries are now developing a Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Tajikistan rail project via Anzhob tunnel that will connect Dushanbe to Khujand.
  
While Kyrgyzstan is a part of Eurasian Union project (EaEU), neither Tajikistan nor Uzbekistan are members of it. As mentioned earlier, such bilateral issues dampen the regional integration project among the countries in Eurasia.


For Uzbekistan, EaEU is akin to walling Central Asia into the former Soviet Union while SCO is akin to opening Central Asia from the clutches of the former Soviet Union.

Ironically, Uzbekistan was blocking India in SCO. This is believed to be due to the influence that Pakistan enjoys in Uzbekistan. Pakistan uses Islam as a strategic tool to increase its relations with other countries.
India and SCO-RATs (Regional Anti-Terrorist cell)

In the Xinjiang province of China, the struggle to attain freedom from China is mixed with calls to establish an independent Islamic state based on Sharia known as East Turkmenistan. China considers this ‘East Turkmenistan Islamic Movement’ or ETIM as a threat to its internal security. They use Afghanistan and Tajikistan as a base to launch their attacks on China.

Tajikistan and Afghanistan have weak economies and incapable governments. They serve as a refuge, an incubator and a base for transnational extremist groups and armed militias. And Uzbekistan shares borders with both of them.

By developing and improving Uzbek capacity to maintain tight security along its borders with Tajikistan and Afghanistan, China aims to prevent the movement of drugs and extremist elements before they enter its borders. At the same time, Chinese concerns on growing radicalization among the Uyghur Muslims in the Xinjiang region, also finds a resonance with Uzbekistan’ concerns on growing radicalization in Fergana valley and calls to establish a government based on Sharia.



Fergana valley is shared between Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Since Uzbekistan follows a secular culture; it considers this ideology of ‘Islamic movement of Uzbekistan’ (IMU) as extremist. These insurgent groupings viz. IMU and ETIM, intermingle with people sharing and supporting the Islamic state of Khorasan (IS-K) movement in Afghanistan, where they share tactics and training.

China has therefore, established the headquarters of Regional Anti-Terrorist Cell (RATs) under the mandate of Shanghai Co-operation Organization (SCO) in Uzbekistan. The flip side of this phenomena is that, this disrupts intraregional trade among SCO member countries.

Tajikistan and Afghanistan suffer from human trafficking by militants who share ideologies with Al Qaeda, Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, East Turkmenistan Islamic Movement, Hizb-ul-Tahrir, Islamic state of Khorasan etc. In the 2019, peace agreement between USA and Taliban, USA has tried to gain assurances from the Taliban that they won’t allow the Afghan soil to be used by transnational militants and extremist elements.

China’ Silk Road Economic Belt (SREB) bypasses Tajikistan and Afghanistan
Now since India is a member of SCO, can India, China and Uzbekistan work together to restrict the growing tide of Wahhabism in Northern parts of Kashmir??



India and Uzbekistan on Tuesday decided to expand counter terror partnership and strengthen information sharing and capacity building mechanism against the menace

The 8th meeting of India-Uzbekistan Joint Working Group on Counter Terrorism was held in New Delhi on July 16, 2019. The meeting was cochaired by Mahaveer Singhvi, Joint Secretary (Counter Terrorism), Ministry of External Affairs and Ambassador Farhod Azriev of Uzbekistan.

The Joint Working Group reviewed threats posed by terrorist groups worldwide and in their respective regions including cross border terrorism. They exchanged views on current counter-terrorism challenges including countering radicalization, combating financing of terrorism, preventing use of internet for terrorist purposes and returnee foreign terrorist fighters.

The two sides also deliberated upon measures to strengthen bilateral cooperation in the sphere of counter terrorism through information sharing, mutual capacity building and sharing of best practices. Cooperation in multilateral fora including UN, SCO-RATS and EAG was also discussed. RATS is based in Tashkent.

Source: Economic Times

Comments